Twitter and the ‘What Now Factor’
As Twitter nears the peak of escalation, I thought we should look to the past for an example of how a channel, like Twitter, starts losing its luster, its most powerful users, and its mass appeal.

George Burns/Harpo Productions, via Associated Press
Oprah and Evan Williams Tweeting on the Oprah Set
“One small message from Oprah, one giant leap for Twitter,” says Jenna Wortham of the New York Times in this morning’s paper. I couldn’t agree more. It was a big week for Twitter, with Ashton Kutcher, Oprah and CNN all vying for screen time on your Twitter stream.
But what does this kind of media attention really mean for Twitter?
The Millionth Follower
As the mainstream media and mega-celebs flock to any new media platform, and the masses follow, the entire community is overwhelmed with a huge volume of low-value content (and low-value participation).
For example, Ashton’s millionth follower was a person with 432 followers, who followed 2 people and has (of yet) never tweeted a word. There’s no value there.
The What Now Factor
My friend Brad introduced me to what he calls the ‘What Now Factor.’ The What Now Factor is the length of time it takes the average user to join a new media channel, figure out the channel, then ask themselves: What Now?
For example, I joined MySpace. Nine months later I had tons of friends, a pretty active MySpace page, and I got bored. That’s when I asked myself: What Now? The answer: Facebook. In my world, I hit the What Now Factor in about nine months on MySpace.
It’s my new-found belief that the What Now Factor very closely correlates to the length of time it takes for a channel to cycle through Escalation. As you can see in the Life Cycle Analysis above, the Escalation phase for MySpace may actually lead to the migration of users to Facebook, which, in late 2006, had just entered its Adoption phase.
Why might this migration occur? The Internet celebrities created in the Adoption phase of MySpace hit the What Now Factor and start to migrate to a new channel (Facebook), leading others on to the ‘next big thing’ at the early stages of Gestation or Adoption on the new channel.
How To Avoid High ‘What Now’ Attrition
Any channel that fails to answer the ‘What now?’ question for its most avid users, as the channel approaches the end of escalation, risks losing their early (and most sophisticated) user base to new channels. In this case, Twitter might lose users to Tumblr or Indenti.ca. So, how can Twitter avoid this migration?
Twitter must do three things:
- Ask The Tough Questions: How is Twitter being used? Where are our users finding the greatest value? What are examples of the highest quality content on Twitter?
- Adjust and Adapt Quickly: With answers to those questions, Twitter must evolve.
- Encourage and exemplify quality content creators who add the most value to their constituents.
Takeaway Message
Try, as hard as you can, to avoid getting caught up in the Twitter hype.
Make sure you’re watching Twitter’s early adopters. Make sure you look for other micro-blogging platforms that answer the ‘What Now?’ question. Most importantly, take a look at who’s following you on Twitter. Look at who you’re following. Take a hard and objective look at the quality of the content you see streaming by all day long and ask yourself: Okay, what now?
My Questions To You
How long do you think it will take you to get to the What Now factor on Twitter, Facebook or LinkedIn? How do you want Twitter to answer the ‘What Now’ question?




Good post. My own Facebook “What Now” moment is coming fast, hurried along by a swarm of status updates about smiling babies, lame attempts at zen humor, and way too many “Which xxx are you” quiz results.
When I saw the headline, I thought the “What Now?” factor would apply to Twitter’s followed, not the followers. Headlines used to be daily; people used to be out of touch regularly; brands used to have slow, quiet relationships with their fans (and enemies).
Twitter is perhaps the most current version of services and a mindset that demand constant communication. The pressure is on to be always changing, always interesting, and always worth reading. From what I’ve seen, there aren’t too many out there who have mastered the challenge. I know I find myself holding back because my “what now” just simply isn’t worth other people’s time most of the time.
J.J.
Thanks so much for your comment. So glad you found my musings!
Your insight is always so smart and well-thought out. I think the fact that Celebrities are making the best use of Twitter actually high-lights exactly what you’re talking about. For years People Magazine, US, National Enquirer… have all made a big business out of keeping up with exactly what celebrities are doing and thinking all day long. I think Twitter may start scooping the paparazzi in a big way. That’s who we really want to keep track of – the stars. That’s not just super stars, but even stars of an industry or local celebs.
Anyway, thanks again for your post.
Have a great day!
My FB “what now” moment happened the moment I got on Twitter. I’m still there – if only to keep in touch with the people who haven’t migrated to Twitter yet. Twitter is and will evolve. I think its future is in search. And, yes, in celebrity – even Ashton Kutcher said as much. With Twitter, he doesn’t need that army of PR types. He can refute claims made in tabloids (for example), and “talk” to the people directly. And the future is in news as well. Those are three threads to build on. But Oprah surely is a tipping point. She has sent many early adopters on Twitter running for the exits. I think that’s stupid. I mean, just because she promotes reading doesn’t mean people stopped reading, right?
Arjun,
Thanks for coming back and continually commenting. You’ve got good chops in the digital space and it’s nice to hear your perspective regularly.
When you say the future for Twitter is in ‘Search.’ What exactly do you mean? I’ve heard this a lot and I want to hear some use-case scenarios.
Can you help me out?
Thanks again,
Drew