Your Web Campaign Is Like Hitting a Golf Ball
How you follow through will determine the overall value
Our recent post Avoid Social Media One Night Stands has generated a lot of internal discussion. We discuss the common belief that traffic spikes are one metric for success — battling that false notion is the basis for a lot of our work here.
A traffic or interest spike is very easy to achieve and looks great in graph form. You just need to throw some flashy graphics into a microsite and blitz the heck out of Twitter and Facebook with announcements (be sure to have lots of ‘share this’ links).
However, if the long-term strategy is to sit back and watch the flashy, static content continue to draw visitors, that spike will come back down to Earth pretty quickly. And the multi-million dollar campaign designed to generate buzz and (hopefully) drive revenue, has simply generated hollow traffic.
It isn’t only how you start, it’s also how you follow through
Your online marketing campaign needs to be like a golf swing.
There are a million things to think about on the backswing. Left arm straight, head down, imagine you’re swinging a hose, imagine you’re sitting on the back of a horse, clear your head but stay focused.
Then, impact, or, in this case, launch. Keep the head down, make sure you clear your hips, kick that knee for a couple extra yards, keep the arms long…
A single moment when the club meets the ball, defined by everything that came before impact, and made effective by what comes after … the follow-through.
Swing through, keep keeping the head down, shift the weight, and rotate all the way around. You can’t just launch your campaign and not follow through, because that’s where the quality of the shot is generated. Without a planned follow-through, you’ll still hit the ball (maybe), but you’ll slice, hook, fade, draw, chunk, fluff, duff, or whiff because you didn’t think about anything that would happen once your club met the ball.
Think about it like this: the backswing creates power, impact creates movement, follow-through determines quality.
TGI Friday’s — nice impact, no follow-through
The example I used in the Social Media One Night Stands piece was the TGI Friday’s Friend Woody campaign, which promised free hamburgers to their Facebook fans if they hit a half million.
Surely enough, they got their half million, then made a push for a million.
TGI Friday’s didn’t plan ahead on this, despite its being a great opportunity for them to learn what works for them. At least they could have asked, politely, for some feedback about the burgers they gave away. What was good? What wasn’t? With an influx of traffic into their locations, they could have gleaned all kinds of insight into service.
Instead, the company has rarely participated on the fan page and the comments tend to come in two flavors:
- I love TGI Friday’s!
- I hate TGI Friday’s!
For people who want to learn more about the restaurant or get an idea if it’s a place they’d like to frequent, this stream of information is valueless.
However, if TGI Friday’s had taken the time to engage those friends who took advantage of the free hamburger, they might have been able to generate some relevant content to develop new fans and new business. Instead, the campaign simply finished and the spike was created.
Follow-through on post-launch activities
The launch of a web campaign is not the end of the campaign; it’s just the middle act of a three-act affair.
You’ll need to participate and engage after the launch. You’ll need to follow through to maximize the campaign’s value. This can mean anything from answering pre-sales and support questions, to keeping the content updated and relevant, and ideally seeking out influential people in your category and getting their insight into the campaign.
Otherwise, you’ll be looking for value in the woods, on the beach, or at the bottom of the lake.




Planning is important for almost everything! I really like your analogy here.
Absolutely! And it goes beyond just planning to launch, set it, and forget it. It needs to be a much longer term strategy.
Brad, I can’t help but suspecting that the immediacy of the new social mediums is, in itself, contributing to short-term thinking. It doesn’t surprise me that mediums that prize “real time” engagement encourage the use of tactics that have no real impact over time. Sustaining communications with customers over the long run takes thinking — and who wants to do that?
Jon,
Thanks for the comment!
You touch on a very important point and one of the problems with social media engagement.
If brands strategize to meet the channel behavior, they can’t plan long term. Like you said, there is an immediacy to it and the “best practices” on a channel change ALL THE TIME. Your Twitter strategy that’s brilliant today could be worthless tomorrow.
However, if you plan a high quality CONTENT strategy, the channel engagement will always be relevant because what you’re providing is always relevant. And the great thing about this is it won’t necessarily take much more thinking than playing to the channel, it just means that the horse moves up in front of the cart… where it belongs.
Thanks for bringing this up!
Brad
Great analogy! You’re right. Follow through is essential and I agree that traffic spikes alone are a poor measure of overall success. It’s important to look for more lasting indicators of progress, such as the number of blog subscribers one has, for example, and how that number grows over time. These will be the people who plan to tune in again and again instead of generating a one-time curiosity click. But, to your point, I think the underlying reason traffic spikes are often used to demonstrate success is because they provide instant gratification and don’t require the sustained effort successful online marketing demands. Keep up the good work!
Thanks Kevin!
You’re right, the only valuable metrics are for long term engagement. There’s just little meaning or ROI to be calculated on traffic alone.
Long term engagement is the key, and I think has been touched upon in various ways in other posts here.
Ultimately, that’s what companies need to be convinced of – what the long-term engagement can do to their bottom line. How content should be utilized on their sites for possible revenue gain/market share.
Not enough companies do this, but I think if they’re shown the way (and given a method for doing it) the proof will be in the pudding, as it were.
Content-as-Service, rather than Content-as-forgettable-commodity.
Dan