2010: RIP RFPs
Madison Avenue is infamous for generating expensive, overwrought creative presentations that hijack agency resources and time for days (if not weeks). Under this model, when responding to a Request for Proposal (RFP) generated by the potential client, agencies compete and the winner is rewarded with a long-term retainer that justifies the energy expended on the pitch.
Nowadays, these long-term engagements are few and far between, partly due to the tenuous state of the economy.
Risk vs. reward
The pitching business is a risky business. After a very short interaction with the prospective client, the agency is given one shot to develop ideas to dramatically and positively affect the clients business. The resources and time dedicated to a new business pitch often dramatically cuts into the profitability of the job (if it is won). If the agency is not chosen, all that work is likely to be forgotten and buried in a dusty server file.
The pitch is shifting
“Pitching is the nature of the beast,” says Paige Arnof-Fenn, founder and CEO of Mavens and Moguls, a Cambridge-based marketing company. “However, the balance has shifted away from long-term retainer engagements to more discrete projects that have a defined beginning, middle and end.”
Although Arnof-Fenn recognizes that 2010 has potential to be stronger than the last couple of years, she believes that most companies now have a comfort level with starting with smaller projects and continuing that trend through the life of the relationship. Even if, at the end of the year, the dollars spent are comparable or even more than what would have been spent had the client signed a retainer, many businesses prefer this hopscotch approach, tackling one box at a time.
Spreading projects out
http://www.vimeo.com/5703121Arnof-Fenn believes budget cuts and budget accountability are further ramifications to the challenging economy, “A lot of CMOs and CEOs used to have autonomy and authority to make significant business decisions. However, now they are held to a higher degree of scrutiny that translates into less freedom to make independent decisions.”
The Board of Directors could get involved in decisions if the contract dollars are large enough, and rather than schedule time at a Board meeting to discuss marketing, CMOs and CEOs skirt the issue, and the red tape, by agreeing to multiple projects for smaller dollars, spread throughout the year.
Building relationships
OTW Advertising in Winchester, MA was operating on 75% retainer at the start if 2009 and by the end, it was 35% of the total revenue. “Figuring out the new way to acquire business took time,” Cindy Hale, president, “I had to find the balance between new sales, ongoing client support and family. As a rule now, we do not respond to RFPs.
Putting agencies in a black box and asking them to design creative in a couple weeks is not the best way to judge the fit. I suggest companies spend time with prospective agencies and their teams, talk to clients and then make a decision. It will prove more successful in the long run.”
Next time …
If companies are not requesting formal RFPs from multiple agencies, then how is agency business generated? And is there a benefit to companies and agencies to multiple smaller jobs as opposed to one longer-term retainer? That is the focus of my next story. What are your business outreach techniques and how are they evolving?


This a great piece! I can say from my personal experience as a Marketing Manager, heavily involved in proposals and pitching new business, that the shift outlined here is dead-on. I see more and more prospects looking for ways to run new projects on a trial basis in order to gain stakeholders within their organization who can then help make a larger deal a reality.
It’s not that CMOs or Marketing Directors in prospective companies don’t want to work with you, it’s that they have limited budgets and often don’t have the momentum or influence to sell a project to executive management without some tangible results. Good stuff and much food for thought here!
Luke,
Thank you for the thoughtful feedback and insight. I think your are exactly right that it is a resource challenge on multiple levels that contributes to this new more project-based way of agencies and companies working together. In addition, the “trial basis” concept you mention is very much a hedging strategy that allows all stakeholders feel more confident in making resource and dollar investments in outside teams. It is a strategy that I perceive will endure.
Rebecca
Great piece, but very few companies have the imagination or energy to dump the RFP. They’re familiar, they feel safe. No one wants to be the first to have to say “Yeah, the company we hired was awful, and I didn’t use an RFP”.
It’s the nature of corporate culture: Do as much as possible to slow decision making, thereby creating safety.
Ian,
Thank you for your comment.
I think you are right. Many companies will not abandon the RFP all together partly because they view the RFP as a laundry list or a punch list of all the things they think they need done. It is their way to manage and control the process as opposed to allowing partners guide the process with their expertise. The companies looking for true partners often do not need a comprehensive RFP as they are looking to align with experts who can help think through the business challenges and develop constructive solutions.
Rebecca